Last modified: 2014-10-11 00:02:01 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T53903, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 51903 - VisualEditor: If the user only has edited in one section (??), insert the name of that section into the edit summary as if they were section-editing
VisualEditor: If the user only has edited in one section (??), insert the nam...
Status: ASSIGNED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
MediaWiki integration (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
:
: 56891 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-07-23 18:46 UTC by kipod
Modified: 2014-10-11 00:02 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description kipod 2013-07-23 18:46:19 UTC
one thing that makes life better with existing editor is the fact that when editing a specific section, the section name is automatically added to the edit summary. often, this ends up being the entire edit summary.

REQUESTED ACTION
1) when hitting "save", test to see if all the diffs are contained in a single section, and if so, add the section name to the edit summary automatically.
2) just like with existing editor, allow the user to modify or remove this part. i.e., the request is to pre-populate the summary box, not to add section name outside of summary box such that the user can't touch it.

peace.
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2013-07-23 18:51:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50872 ***
Comment 2 Ignatzmice 2013-07-29 22:50:21 UTC
I agree with kipod's comments at bug 50872, this bug is not a duplicate if that one. This would be a very useful feature (if rather resource-intensive).
Comment 3 James Forrester 2013-07-30 15:58:39 UTC
You're right, this isn't a duplicate; I'm re-opening and titling it to be clearer.
Comment 4 Elitre 2013-08-13 14:10:25 UTC
A user at it.wp wonders: if VE could pre-populate the summary box, could it also auto-add the text that was added, in case of very short additions? i.e., if someone added a parameter to a template, could it automatically detect what was added and write it in the edit summary? Thanks.
Comment 5 Matthew Flaschen 2013-08-14 18:54:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> A user at it.wp wonders: if VE could pre-populate the summary box, could it
> also auto-add the text that was added, in case of very short additions? i.e.,
> if someone added a parameter to a template, could it automatically detect
> what was added and write it in the edit summary? Thanks.

Yes, in theory, but in my opinion, that's a separate bug.  Filed as bug 52859.
Comment 6 Elitre 2013-08-14 20:37:48 UTC
(Thanks Matthew!)
Comment 7 James Forrester 2013-11-19 06:29:28 UTC
*** Bug 56891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Elitre 2014-10-10 08:25:40 UTC
Isn't this the current behavior (for various meanings of "section editing")?
Comment 9 James Forrester 2014-10-11 00:02:01 UTC
(In reply to Elitre from comment #8)
> Isn't this the current behavior (for various meanings of "section editing")?

No. This is asking for VE-MW to insert the name of the section edited if only one section was edited, even if the editor was launched from a page-level link. Doing it when the user clicks a section edit link was bug 50872 and is indeed done. Not doing it when the user clicks a section edit link and then edits outside the link is bug 58488.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links