Last modified: 2014-05-18 00:13:53 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T50274, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 48274 - VisualEditor: For edit summary field, give users an auto-fill drop-down (or similar) of recent edit summaries they've used
VisualEditor: For edit summary field, give users an auto-fill drop-down (or s...
Status: ASSIGNED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
MediaWiki integration (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-05-08 21:31 UTC by James Forrester
Modified: 2014-05-18 00:13 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description James Forrester 2013-05-08 21:31:33 UTC
We use textarea which means that browsers don't suggest text from previous uses.
Comment 1 Ed Sanders 2013-05-18 18:55:01 UTC
...or implement our own autocomplete?
Comment 2 James Forrester 2013-05-19 15:56:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> ...or implement our own autocomplete?

Possibly. Given that we are intending to replace this wikitext field with a full VE micro-surface (with the limited scope that log entries allow), that might be a bit fiddly, though. There's also not currently a useful API to query "useful edit summaries" from. Marking as a longer-term consideration.
Comment 3 Raimond Spekking 2013-05-19 19:32:50 UTC
Browser's autosuggestion/complete is the most used function during editing Wikipedia, especially when I do similar edits. Every time I test the VE is miss this function because the field is a textarea instead of an input field. It's really annoying to type every time the summary instead of selecting out of previous summaries.
Comment 4 James Forrester 2013-05-19 19:48:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Browser's autosuggestion/complete is the most used function during editing
> Wikipedia, especially when I do similar edits. Every time I test the VE is
> miss this function because the field is a textarea instead of an input field.
> It's really annoying to type every time the summary instead of selecting out of
> previous summaries.

Sure, but this functionality isn't possible for proper editable surfaces with rich text, links and other HTML items that these fields will allow.
Comment 5 Krinkle 2013-06-10 01:58:56 UTC
Rephrased bug summary. "textbox" doesn't exist. There is "input" and "textarea" both are "form fields".
Comment 6 MZMcBride 2013-06-12 23:17:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> ...or implement our own autocomplete?

It depends what the use-case is. Personally, I like the current multi-line input and my browser stopped remembering my inputs for <input>s long ago (perhaps when I switched from Firefox to Chrome).

However, just brainstorming, to address Raimond's use-case in comment 3, it may be possible to query the most recent X edit summaries a user has used and implement a suggestion feature based on those. That might cover the repeated edits use-case.
Comment 7 Ed Sanders 2013-06-13 17:57:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > ...or implement our own autocomplete?
> 
> However, just brainstorming, to address Raimond's use-case in comment 3, it
> may
> be possible to query the most recent X edit summaries a user has used and
> implement a suggestion feature based on those. That might cover the repeated
> edits use-case.

That's pretty much what I meant. The autocomplete would populate from recent commit messages, or they would just be shown in a dropdown.
Comment 8 Chris McKenna 2013-07-10 18:08:56 UTC
A suggested list populated with recent edit summaries will be really useful when VE is extended to talk namespace. Almost every time I close an RfD as something other than delete, I make an edit to the redirect's talk page with the summary "Noting old RFD" or "Note old RFD and tag for relevant WikiProjects" (depending whether they are already tagged or not).
Comment 9 James Forrester 2013-07-10 18:44:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> A suggested list populated with recent edit summaries will be really useful
> when VE is extended to talk namespace.

We're not planning to make VisualEditor work with talk pages, but instead this will be done by Flow (which will use VisualEditor for editing content).

That said, we still think this would be valuable, and it's definitely in our plans.
Comment 10 Quiddity 2013-07-25 18:20:56 UTC
The main threads in VE/F:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive_2013_05#Edit_summaries_have_no_.27memory.27
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive_2013_06#Predictive_texting_in_edit_summaries
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive_2013_06#Edit_summaries_-_menu_of_recently-used.3F
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive_2013_07#Speed.2C_Edit_Summary.2C_and_Limitations



Closely related are:

Bug 42139 ("There is no preview of edit summaries") - Wanted, so that we can test WP:shortcut links etc are correctly-targeted.

Bug 50961 ("Provide simultaneous access to editor and edit summary") - So that we don't have to remember everything we did, after a multitask edit.
Comment 11 Axel Boldt 2013-12-16 22:21:11 UTC
I think this should be low priority. Only power users need quick access to commonly used edit summaries, and these power users will by definition know OS-wide tools like autohotkey or ditto which can do the job much more comfortably.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links