Last modified: 2014-08-25 14:23:49 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T69709, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 67709 - Change default thumbnail size to 300px for all WMF wikis
Change default thumbnail size to 300px for all WMF wikis
Status: PATCH_TO_REVIEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: community-consensus-needed
Depends on:
Blocks: 49357
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-07-09 00:21 UTC by James Forrester
Modified: 2014-08-25 14:23 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description James Forrester 2014-07-09 00:21:56 UTC
Bug 67703 suggests that we change the default wiki thumbnail size to 300px width, based on user settings data, for all Wikimedia wikis as well as for the MediaWiki software itself. Copying here for that part of the change.
Comment 1 This, that and the other (TTO) 2014-07-09 02:13:19 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 49357 ***
Comment 2 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-08-16 14:34:23 UTC
Change 154408 had a related patch set uploaded by Jforrester:
Increase default thumbnail display size from 220px to 300px

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/154408
Comment 3 James Forrester 2014-08-16 14:47:29 UTC
I've scheduled this for the SF-morning SWAT slot on Monday, 25 August.
Comment 4 Derk-Jan Hartman 2014-08-20 11:11:42 UTC
Has this been announced to the wider community ?
Comment 5 Jared Zimmerman (WMF) 2014-08-20 18:51:36 UTC
DJ, via village technical pump and ambassadors list
Comment 6 Derk-Jan Hartman 2014-08-21 15:44:48 UTC
Actually, I checked the news update and the deploy of the change seem to be scheduled for the same day.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2014/35

Seems that that is a bit short notice...
Comment 7 James Forrester 2014-08-21 17:01:21 UTC
(In reply to Derk-Jan Hartman from comment #6)
> Actually, I checked the news update and the deploy of the change seem to be
> scheduled for the same day.
> 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2014/35
> 
> Seems that that is a bit short notice...

That's the reminder update I put in that it's happening – there was an initial annoucement back in June, I thought?
Comment 8 Brad Jorsch 2014-08-21 18:32:35 UTC
I don't see reference to any sort of user studies indicating this change would be positive (or at least non-detrimental) for readers, even those not browsing with fullscreen browsers on large displays or mobile devices with extreme display densities. Nor do I see any evidence that the community at large was informed about this, much less asked for input.

The one discussion I did find, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29/Archive_128#Time_for_the_semi-annual_enlarging_of_thumbnail_images, was closed as "no consensus". Mainly because it was mostly people giving opinion with no actual user research.

So yeah, let's not go making such user-visible changes without some support for why we're doing them.
Comment 9 Quiddity 2014-08-21 19:10:37 UTC
(In reply to Jared Zimmerman (WMF) from comment #5)
> DJ, via village technical pump and ambassadors list

The Thumbnail Style update, was announced on the ambassadors list (and then postponed), but not the Thumbnail Size change.
Comment 10 Derk-Jan Hartman 2014-08-22 10:12:06 UTC
I don't feel comfortable with pushing this change, especially right now. There is enough of a mess already, I don't want us to generate more.

I propose we just have this sit around until someone comes asking again, and then we point them here, saying there is no technical reasons not to do it, only political and that if they show us something that resembles a community agreement _across_ the wiki's, we will deploy this. That will save us the time in having to shepherd this through, collect evidence and deal with post change effects. Lets use that time for more important and constructive long term improvements, like for instance... SUL

I mean, it's not like we need this from a software or operations point of view. Design wants it (but I don't see how it would be critical to them) and a lot of community members have asked for it, but until someone shows me something resembling community consensus over multiple wikis, i'm not very much inclined to support a change like this. And even when that is there, we still need to do a substantial announcement.

So for anyone visiting this ticket: "Please show that you have the support of a substantial number of wikimedia communities and NO, for technical reasons, this is NOT a per project decision."

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links