Last modified: 2013-10-28 11:24:45 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T54197, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 52197 - please fix certain types of edit conflict - new section versus editing the last section
please fix certain types of edit conflict - new section versus editing the la...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 22783
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page editing (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-07-28 18:07 UTC by WereSpielChequers
Modified: 2013-10-28 11:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description WereSpielChequers 2013-07-28 18:07:25 UTC
edit conflicts are a pain especially to newbies. Many common edit conflicts could be avoided with minor changes to MediaWiki.

If the mediawiki software treated adding a new section as not conflicting with editing the final section of a page then many  common edit conflicts would become parallel editing.

So currently if the page ends:
==blah==
I have an idea ********** signed ~~~~

and two people want to edit changing it to either :


==blah==
I have an idea ********** signed ~~~~
:breeches NotCensored, NotSocialMedia, iz fattening and possibly licensed to the Illuminati. Do it! ~~~~

Or

==blah==
I have an idea ********** signed ~~~~
==Reptilians==
OK so per BLP we can't have a category of ''People named  by ****" as Reptilians. But how about a hidden category? Wouldn't that make more sense anyway? ~~~~

One of them will have a nasty edit conflict and will either waste some time or be lost forever. But if we changed mediawiki to say that a new section can always be added without edit conflict then  we can haz:


==blah==
I have an idea ********** signed ~~~~
:breeches NotCensored, NotSocialMedia, iz fattening and possibly licensed to the Illuminati. Do it! ~~~~

==Reptilians==
OK so per BLP we can't have a category of ''People named  by ****" as Reptilians. But how about a hidden category? Wouldn't that make more sense anyway? ~~~~

If you doubt the value of this do some stats on the number of edit conflicts per day, and their effect on editor retention
Comment 1 Jesús Martínez Novo (Ciencia Al Poder) 2013-07-28 18:15:59 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 22783 ***
Comment 2 Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia 2013-07-28 21:55:31 UTC
This was not solved for so many years; either you do-it-yourself or you wait until the happy-makers deploy Flow.

The background of all this is that MW pages are verrry baad for discussion. Each time someone adds a comment, the whole page content is stored in the database. The same happens when changing a category. All this is ignored for years now, and, instead one extension follows the next one. No one cares about the basics. The board or Sue made a decision and all devs had to spend their power there.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links