Last modified: 2012-05-15 14:19:16 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T32559, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 30559 - NoSQL Support
NoSQL Support
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Database (Other open bugs)
1.4.x
Macintosh Mac System 9.x
: Normal blocker (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Domas Mituzas
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 29079 30561
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-08-24 20:41 UTC by Sam Reed (reedy)
Modified: 2012-05-15 14:19 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: Internet Explorer
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-08-24 20:41:46 UTC 
MediaWiki should support NoSQL
Comment 1 Antoine "hashar" Musso (WMF) 2011-08-24 20:43:00 UTC 
we have memcached.
Comment 2 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-08-24 22:38:37 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> we have memcached.

Does memcached provide a permanent store?
Comment 3 Max Semenik 2011-08-25 03:50:04 UTC 
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cassandra
Comment 4 Daniel Friesen 2011-08-25 06:55:27 UTC 
Extension:Cassandra is just a text store. SQL + KV-store != NoSQL.
Comment 5 Max Semenik 2011-08-25 07:46:03 UTC 
But it's webscale! Outrageous!
Comment 6 Max Semenik 2011-09-04 10:21:26 UTC 
Per http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/1016320617/mongodb-is-web-scale we should aim for /dev/null instead.
Comment 7 Alphos 2011-09-04 10:31:01 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> Per http://nosql.mypopescu.com/post/1016320617/mongodb-is-web-scale we should
> aim for /dev/null instead.

Why not just support the BLACKHOLE storage engine ( http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/blackhole-storage-engine.html ) in MySQL ? Is MongoDB more efficient at storing no data ?
What about /dev/null ? Is it better or worse than MongoDB ?
If it is, I support this featreq.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links