Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:38:26 UTC
1.5-cvs puts <h*> sections in the TOC, the only reason we keep them around anymore is to make sections that you *don't* want in the TOC, <h*> should either be deprecated or this bug fixed. Testcase, will display section edit links for all these sections if section editing is turned on: <h2> Section 1 </h2> Section 1Section 1Section 1Section 1Section 1 <h2> Section 2 </h2> Section 2 Section 2 Section 2 Section 2 Section 2 Section 2 == Section 3 == Section 3Section 3Section 3Section 3Section 3Section 3Section 3Section 3 === Section 4 === Section 4Section 4Section 4Section 4Section 4Section 4Section 4Section 4 === Section 5 === Section 5Section 5Section 5Section 5Section 5Section 5Section 5Section 5 === Section 6 === Section 6 Section 6 Section 6 Section 6 Section 6 Section 6
See also bug 2128, a section editing bug in 1.4.
Dropping severity to normal, as it does not affect the edit-link functionality, unlike bug 2128.
Personally, I've considered tags like "<h*>" "deprecated" for a long time, and the use of them to not appear in the TOC as a thoroughly ugly hack. Maybe it should just do nothing, and make people use the "proper" wiki-markup, but that's more of a cosmetic issue than a release-halting bug, I'd say. In other words, I would call this more of a fix than a bug. ;)
(In reply to comment #3) > Personally, I've considered tags like "<h*>" "deprecated" for a long time, and > the use of them to not appear in the TOC as a thoroughly ugly hack. I am not opposed to removing <h*>, as I don't really like using HTML in wikitext. But if it happens there needs to be wiki syntax for headers that don't belong in the TOC. If not by changing the current syntax to accomodate it, something like __NOTOCSECTION__ similar to for section edit links would work.
(In reply to comment #2) > Dropping severity to normal, as it does not affect the edit-link functionality, > unlike bug 2128. The reason I marked it as major was that the only reason we even keep <h[1-6]> around anymore is this particular functionality (i.e. it doensn't add to the TOC). Moving severety back to major since this would break alot of 1.4 pages when 1.5 rolls out.
*** Bug 2607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Not a bug; this is a *fix* for bug 2128.
*** Bug 2776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 2956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
