Last modified: 2013-12-10 02:14:09 UTC
Untested patch attached.
(In reply to comment #0)
> Untested patch attached.
You seem to have forgotten it.
Also, I'm really curious to see how you're gonna implement this without fragmenting the Squid cache.
Created attachment 6450 [details]
Needs XVO header.
Created attachment 6739 [details]
Updated patch so it applies cleanly to current trunk.
Per discussion in #wikimedia-tech, using XVO would make this possible, but:
* It would need to be restricted to a very small set of prefs to keep cache fragmentation (which increases exponentially with the number of allowed prefs) at bay
* There is the fear that enabling even a very limited version of anonymous preferences will open the floodgates to using XVO for all kinds of random purposes
*** Bug 23908 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*Bulk BZ Change: +Patch to open bugs with patches attached that are missing the keyword*
+need-review to signal to developers that this patch needs reviewing
I don't think this is a good idea, and operations is pretty radically opposed
to using this on Wikipedia. Closing WONTFIX.
*** Bug 14602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***