Last modified: 2010-05-15 16:03:25 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T15284, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 13284 - Users should be able to use customized edittools
Users should be able to use customized edittools
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 9754
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
1.13.x
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-03-07 16:51 UTC by Meno25
Modified: 2010-05-15 16:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Meno25 2008-03-07 16:51:17 UTC 
Summary says it all. Users should be able to use customized edittools. Sometimes a user would like to change his edittools. He should be able to do so without having to ask a sysop to change global edittools affecting the whole wiki. I  am not sure if devs have enough time/man power to implement a feature request like this but I think it would be helpful. Thanks.
Comment 1 Guillaume Paumier 2008-03-08 18:38:51 UTC 
Isn't this already possible by editing one's monobook.js?
Comment 2 Huji 2008-03-09 16:22:43 UTC 
No. JavaScript based solutions modify the editing tools after they are loaded. This means, for example, if a wiki is using a huge set of editing tools, the user has to wait for all of them (many kilobytes) to be downloaded, before the JavaScript solution modifies/hides them.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2008-03-10 19:20:34 UTC 
Duping this to bug 9754.

See also some notes on bug 11130 about ajax-ifying the default edittools so they're loaded in a different way that may be nicer for the described cases.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9754 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links