Last modified: 2011-03-02 00:47:33 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 3732 - The logging table needs a log_user_text field so that events from anonymous users can be logged
The logging table needs a log_user_text field so that events from anonymous u...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Database (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Aaron Schulz
: schema-change
: 6209 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 10331 16660 1542 5970 16012 17343
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-10-18 03:42 UTC by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Modified: 2011-03-02 00:47 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2005-10-18 03:42:06 UTC
The logging table needs a log_user_text field so that events from unloggedin
users can be logge.
Comment 1 Rotem Liss 2006-06-05 16:11:46 UTC
*** Bug 6209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Rotem Liss 2006-06-05 16:15:19 UTC
It seems that this field should be filled when running update.php, and it should
be changed when the Renameuser extension changes someone's user name.
Comment 3 P.Copp 2008-10-14 13:32:40 UTC
*** Bug 14735 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Siebrand Mazeland 2009-02-02 16:00:25 UTC
Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema change.
Comment 5 Roan Kattouw 2009-02-02 16:03:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema
> change.
> 

Adding back. Although there is no patch, the bug explicitly asks for a schema change. See also the description of the schema-change keyword.
Comment 6 Siebrand Mazeland 2009-02-02 16:05:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema
> > change.
> > 
> 
> Adding back. Although there is no patch, the bug explicitly asks for a schema
> change. See also the description of the schema-change keyword.
> 
Makes for a useless search on this keyword, then. Unless it is combined with "patch" and "need-review" keywords. At the moment 21 issues have keyword "schema-change".
Comment 7 Roan Kattouw 2009-02-02 16:09:29 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Removed 'schema-change' keyword. No patch attached that requires a schema
> > > change.
> > > 
> > 
> > Adding back. Although there is no patch, the bug explicitly asks for a schema
> > change. See also the description of the schema-change keyword.
> > 
> Makes for a useless search on this keyword, then. Unless it is combined with
> "patch" and "need-review" keywords. At the moment 21 issues have keyword
> "schema-change".
> 

Yeah, I guess that's true.
Comment 9 Brion Vibber 2009-02-27 18:43:16 UTC
Restoring schema-change keyword.
Comment 10 Dan Jacobson 2009-03-17 21:18:50 UTC
php importTextFile.php's user=Maintenance_script will show up in
RecentChanges, but like Bug #17343, when one checks (the security
cameras at) Special:Log, it's like (the bandits took out the film) "I
didn't see anything, did you?". Also users are shown plenty of
worthless links in RecentChanges to "Maintenance script (Talk |block)
(Importing text file)".
Comment 11 Dan Jacobson 2009-03-21 02:12:48 UTC
I wonder what putting
+---------+--------------+
| user_id | user_name    |
+---------+--------------+
|       0 | Default User |
+---------+--------------+
into the user table would do, at least for Bug #17343.
Comment 12 Aaron Schulz 2009-06-16 20:07:32 UTC
Finished in r51997
Comment 13 Dan Jacobson 2009-06-26 23:21:10 UTC
Bug 17343 was supposed to be "fixed automatically" when this one was...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links