Last modified: 2007-02-28 18:17:58 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T10539, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 8539 - Replace "changes" message with a form that passes the value as a parameter
Replace "changes" message with a form that passes the value as a parameter
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Internationalization (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:...
: patch, patch-need-review
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2007-01-08 16:20 UTC by Sasa Stefanovic
Modified: 2007-02-28 18:17 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
A patch (2.00 KB, patch)
2007-01-11 18:35 UTC, Niklas Laxström 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Sasa Stefanovic 2007-01-08 16:20:38 UTC 
When viewing enhanced recentchanges, and if there is more than one edit on page,
there is a link to that shows how many changes was there on that page, it shows
something like (3 changes). So, i'm asking here to introduce plural MW option on
Mediawiki:Changes page.

Thanks a best regards. Sasa Stefanovic
Comment 1 Niklas Laxström 2007-01-11 18:35:37 UTC 
Created attachment 3047 [details]
A patch

Putting this patch here. I cannot test it currently.
Comment 2 Raimond Spekking 2007-02-28 15:44:13 UTC 
Is this really necessary? If there is only 1 change [[MediaWiki:Changes]] is not
used. I have tested the patch, it works but without any visible effect.

Maybe I have ignored facts, otherwise this bug can be closed as WORKSFORME.
Comment 3 Niklas Laxström 2007-02-28 16:01:13 UTC 
It is. I suggest reading
http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_chapter/gettext_10.html#SEC150
Comment 4 Raimond Spekking 2007-02-28 18:17:58 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> It is. I suggest reading
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_chapter/gettext_10.html#SEC150 

Thanks for the link, very interesting.

Patch applied in r20087
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links