Last modified: 2012-11-10 16:12:33 UTC
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wiederherstellungsw%C3%BCnsche&offset=20060726234407&action=history Have a look at the edits with the summary "Inneres" (the single one from 0:21 is not of interest). What happened (which doesn't correnspond to the history): First I edited the page, asking to unblock the article Inneres. This edit is at this saved normally, the page looks normal. Then Rax answered the 1st time, still everything is normal. Gunthers edit is saved normal too, but after I answered something got wrong. The history got messed up, the edits got in disorder. After this Rax answered and me again, and after that I made a test edit adding only a bit. If you only switch through the diffview (by selecting a correct, nonbroken starting point) you'll see the correct order, but the history is totally messed up. The discussion is just linear. First error was the my first 2 edits (starting and answer to gunther) swapped, then in consequence of the following 2 edits the history got even more in disorder. Bdk sayd it would be good to make a bugreport.
Sorry, the first edit wasn't precise enough. To stress it more: the concerning discussion has been maded just linear. One answered the other, and everything nice and neat with one more colon each answer :-) So one thing at a time: Here you can see the full discussion http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wiederherstellungsw%C3%83%C2%BCnsche&diff=19443415&oldid=19440941 but the edit is corrupt, but therefore look at the next http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Contributions/Amtiss filter it by the namespace "Wikipedia". You will see on 26th of July two edit on 10 o'clock p.m. (aka 22:xy). They are in the wrong order. First I made the things shown in the edit of 22:40 and after that (in between there was a edit of Rax and Gunther) I answered Gunther, but this is shown as the edit of 22:26.
Marking this as shell; the fixing of timestamps will need to be applied. (About 55 minutes off, as I recall)
This hasn't been touched in 5 years Do we care enough to bother fixing this?
(In reply to comment #3) > This hasn't been touched in 5 years THIS IS NOT A REASON TO RESOLVE A BUG AS "WONTFIX." STOP DOING IT. There is a bug about database cleanup (bug 16660), which this bug is properly marked as blocking. There is no reason to mark this as resolved until it has actually been resolved. Re-opening.
22:21, 26 July 2006 (diff | hist) Wikipedia:Löschprüfung/alt (→Inneres (erledigt): kurze antwort rax) 21:30, 26 July 2006 (diff | hist) m Wikipedia:Löschprüfung/alt (→Inneres: test) 20:40, 26 July 2006 (diff | hist) Wikipedia:Löschprüfung/alt (Inneres) 20:26, 26 July 2006 (diff | hist) Wikipedia:Löschprüfung/alt (→Inneres: ack gunther) Presumably meaning one edit was deleted. Does this actually have any relevance to attempt to "fix" a now 5+ year old edit that was seemingly seconds out of order? First link points to a history of a non-existent page
"Does this actually have any relevance" - you decise. If I would decide
"Does this actually have any relevance" - you decise. If I would decide I would set "WONTFIX". -> Changed the priority to lowest.
Underlying code problem is bug 2930. WONTFIX for fixing this occurrence of the problem, as there's dozens of other occurrence from the same times. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2930 ***
