Last modified: 2014-08-28 22:43:24 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T64443, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 62443 - Filter Special:ActiveUsers by number of actions
Filter Special:ActiveUsers by number of actions
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 23237
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
1.23.0
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Specia...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-03-08 21:44 UTC by TeleComNasSprVen
Modified: 2014-08-28 22:43 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description TeleComNasSprVen 2014-03-08 21:44:12 UTC
Currently, [[Special:ActiveUsers]] filters only by alphabetical order, but there should be an option - whether it be checkbox, switch or whatever - that filters by least to most number of actions committed or vice versa.

Example: filtering so that User:X who has 1842 edits in the last 30 days is at the top of the list while User:Y who only has one edit in the last 30 days appears at the bottom.
Comment 1 Dan Garry 2014-04-29 14:51:31 UTC
The topic of ActiveUsers came up recently as it was causing quite a bit of server strain. Originally we were just going to disable ActiveUsers completely on the Wikimedia cluster, but instead Aaron Schulz managed to rework the backend to make it more performant.

A lot of the use cases of ActiveUsers don't need sorting (e.g. "As a Community Liaison I want to message all active users on a particular wiki to inform them about software updates."). That said, this would be a cool feature to have, but sorting algorithms on massive datasets aren't always cheap from a performance standpoint. We may have to consider not doing this if that's the case.

CCing Aaron for his input.
Comment 2 Robin Pepermans (SPQRobin) 2014-08-28 22:43:24 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23237 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links