Last modified: 2007-06-08 01:10:46 UTC
Hallo! It might be a good ides to expand the "final comment" before </body></html> with additional information: revisionid; it should be available in the browsers sorce code anyway timestamp; I suppose the timestamp when this page gets generated / cached ??? I assume this would facilitate referencing and fault finding. best regards reinhardt [[user:gangleri]]
It would be far more useful to provide that in machine-readable form for JS usage.
(In reply to comment #1) > It would be far more useful to provide that in > machine-readable form for JS usage. Agree. Start with the machine-readable form for JS usage. If it is to cryptic (if people could not associate it with its meaning) then please append a comment character and a minimal legible hint.
I wonder how action=purge effects should be included. *scenario* User A describes the rendering of page X with revision_id N at (UTC) time NOW. Templates might change, software updates might be involved, action=purge migth generate different code. If user B looks at page X with revision_id N at (UTC) time LATER he should be able to see at least the timestamp of last *rebuild* of the page. This timestamp may differ from the timestamp of the last change for page X.
Please stop posting random junk all over bug reports. Thanks.
The revision identifier is exposed as wgCurRevisionId. I'm not sure we need the "page touched" timestamp...
Original issue was fixed, the page_touched value would be of limited use to client-side scripts.
