Last modified: 2014-04-16 19:33:44 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T55303, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 53303 - VisualEditor: Don't allow nested <ref>s, because Cite.php doesn't
VisualEditor: Don't allow nested <ref>s, because Cite.php doesn't
Status: ASSIGNED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
Data Model (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High minor
: ---
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-08-24 19:45 UTC by WhatamIdoing
Modified: 2014-04-16 19:33 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description WhatamIdoing 2013-08-24 19:45:52 UTC
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback#VE.2C_Sfn_template_within_reference.2C_Vcite_error

Adding a <ref> tag (e.g., a bibliographic citation) inside another <ref> tag with a different group (e.g., an explanatory footnote), displays as desired in VisualEditor, but when you save the page, it isn't visible because of Bug 20707 in Cite.php

This is most likely to happen with a ref-creating template like {{sfn}}, since VisualEditor doesn't have the buttons to created nested ref tags directly.
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2013-08-26 09:41:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Adding a <ref> tag (e.g., a bibliographic citation) inside another <ref> tag
> with a different group (e.g., an explanatory footnote), displays as desired
> in
> VisualEditor, but when you save the page, it isn't visible because of Bug
> 20707
> in Cite.php

If this problem is covered in bug 20707 already I'm not sure what your intention was to file another bug report. Could you clarify please?
Comment 2 WhatamIdoing 2013-09-09 21:39:13 UTC
We have mismatched behavior.  Either *both* systems should display nested refs, or VisualEditor should stop displaying nested refs to match the limited features available to readers.

Whether this mismatch should be solved by reducing VisualEditor's ability to process nested refs or by increasing the other system's ability to process nested refs is beyond my paygrade.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links