Last modified: 2014-10-15 08:23:48 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T51446, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 49446 - Notifications: Linking a username in an Edit-Summary should trigger a notification
Notifications: Linking a username in an Edit-Summary should trigger a notific...
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Echo (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 11 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
: 60056 71544 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-06-11 17:44 UTC by Quiddity
Modified: 2014-10-15 08:23 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Quiddity 2013-06-11 17:44:16 UTC
Add a check of the edit summary, for any links to a username. Don't require the ~~~~ check in these cases.

Eg. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Signatures&diff=prev&oldid=556815553 this edit],
Eg.2. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Peteforsyth&diff=prev&oldid=554514702 another edit]

This would allow us to "ping" a user, in any namespace.

It would allow us to notify someone that their question had been answered, or query something about their edit, without working their name into the text of the response.

My only concern is that this might get over-used, leading to some power-users "pinging" too often/easily. Ie. trying to use edit summaries as a communication tool. Eg. "Does this look right [[User:Ironholds]]?"

Possibly the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks?


(I thought Notifications was already doing this, hence I've been linking usernames in some edit summaries for the last few weeks.. >.< )
Comment 1 Technical 13 2013-06-18 18:11:14 UTC
Glad I found an existing bug for something this time...  I'd support this idea.  I don't see this being abused much as doing so would likely end up in repercussions starting with a warning of the user to a worst case of blocking a user and restricting talk page access.
Comment 2 Alex Monk 2013-06-18 20:56:26 UTC
I don't think this could/would be abused or over-used any more than mentions in talk page text.
Comment 3 Quiddity 2013-06-18 21:08:21 UTC
(I worry too much, and sometimes try to answer objections preemptively! My worry here is negligible. (And not a negligee))
Comment 4 Technical 13 2013-07-07 18:28:29 UTC
This was asked about again (- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notifications#Ping_question -) Seems to be some consensus developing that the community wants this.  Thanks.
Comment 5 Helder 2013-08-24 18:00:30 UTC
+1

Any abuses of such a feature could be dealt with in the usual way (wikis can have local policies defining what to do in these cases...)
Comment 7 spage 2013-09-23 20:44:00 UTC
Prioritization and scheduling of this bug is tracked on Mingle card https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/flow/cards/217
Comment 8 Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) 2014-01-14 22:25:47 UTC
*** Bug 60056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 MZMcBride 2014-03-12 03:33:23 UTC
Bug 30750 is closely related.
Comment 10 Quiddity 2014-10-02 17:04:04 UTC
*** Bug 71544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 praveenp 2014-10-15 08:22:29 UTC
This bug seriously affecting the usage of translatewiki.net because it is almost impossible to check recent edits.
Comment 12 praveenp 2014-10-15 08:23:48 UTC
Sorry wrong bug, wrong comment :-(

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links