Last modified: 2014-08-14 22:28:44 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T49858, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 47858 - Enable jquery.tablesorter on mobile
Enable jquery.tablesorter on mobile
Status: NEW
Product: MobileFrontend
Classification: Unclassified
Feature requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 31601
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2013-04-30 00:40 UTC by Juliusz Gonera
Modified: 2014-08-14 22:28 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Juliusz Gonera 2013-04-30 00:40:47 UTC 
Currently it doesn't: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sortable_table

Exception thrown by mediawiki.page.ready: Unknown dependency: jquery.tablesorter 

Apart from adding mobile target in Resources.php in core, we need to fix our CSS because <td> positioning is wrong when using tablesorter.
Comment 1 Jon 2013-04-30 14:29:25 UTC 
What is the benefit of adding this to mobile?
Do people really care about table sorting on a mobile device?
Does it even make sense on a mobile phone?
How does this play into existing problems with tables which have remained unsolved for years [1]?
How would the controls work on mobile?

We should think from the user's perspective rather than the existing code perspective.

[1] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36936
Comment 2 Jon 2013-04-30 14:30:25 UTC 
Also:
Is it worth the additional payload no matter how small?
Has the existing code been tested vigorously across mobile devices? Will it be tested vigorously in future?
Comment 3 Juliusz Gonera 2013-04-30 19:23:04 UTC 
While I agree that this is not a top priority, I'm not sure why the status is UNCONFIRMED.
Comment 4 Jon 2013-05-01 14:49:47 UTC 
Not sure what happened there didn't mean to change it. Marking as NEW again.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links