Last modified: 2014-04-16 13:13:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T49622, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 47622 - Bugzilla gerrit bot should mention patch author when notifying about a new changeset
Bugzilla gerrit bot should mention patch author when notifying about a new ch...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Git/Gerrit (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Unprioritized enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 17322
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-04-24 21:47 UTC by Bartosz Dziewoński
Modified: 2014-04-16 13:13 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-04-24 21:47:09 UTC
Bugzilla gerrit bot should mention patch author when notifying about a new changeset.


Example bot post:

Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/60705 (Gerrit Change
I3517a9aab8fa8935a86130c4bbdc0ce117f28f02)

(From bug 45979 comment 7.)
Comment 1 Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-05-12 13:06:23 UTC
Any progress on this?
Comment 2 christian 2013-05-13 11:53:17 UTC
I am not sure how much content of the gerrit discussion we should
bring over to bugzilla. We already had several requests to have gerrit
add less comments, or make the comments even denser.

So I would rather not pack more information into the comments added by
gerrit's bugzilla plugin.

Besides, would it make a difference for the change to see /who/
uploaded it? I hope the answer is „no”, and a change would undergoes
the same review process regardless of whether Tim, Chad, or my mother
uploaded it.

But what do others think? Would adding the author make sense?

If so, only the author or also the committer?
Should we add further notices if follo-wup patch sets on the same
change come from a different author/committer?
That'd get crowded really quick :-/

But I'd rather leave it as it is now.
Comment 3 Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-05-18 19:44:47 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Besides, would it make a difference for the change to see /who/
> uploaded it? I hope the answer is „no”, and a change would undergoes
> the same review process regardless of whether Tim, Chad, or my mother
> uploaded it.

Well, we do set the assignees sometimes. So it does matter who is working on a bug, and it'd be nice if this could be visible without actually going to gerrit.


> If so, only the author or also the committer?

This would usually be the same person. I think the most appropriate would be the changeset "owner" on gerrit (that is, as far as I understand it, committer of the first patchset).
Comment 4 Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-06-28 21:29:01 UTC
Looking at bug 23942 comment 13 this seems fixed. Thanks guys.
Comment 5 Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-07-01 09:10:51 UTC
Hmm, it's using patch's committer, not patch's author nor patchset owner. I'd say this is suboptimal (for example: the bot posts notification with me as the author when I link a bug in somebody else's commit's message).
Comment 6 Bartosz Dziewoński 2014-04-16 13:13:28 UTC
Ah, whatever. It's good enough.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links