Last modified: 2014-10-21 15:32:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 42510 - Code coverage extremely low - technical debt
Code coverage extremely low - technical debt
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataClient (Other open bugs)
master
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
:
Depends on: 72318
Blocks: code_quality
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-11-28 16:50 UTC by Jeroen De Dauw
Modified: 2014-10-21 15:32 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Sad client is very sad (19.53 KB, image/png)
2012-12-14 22:27 UTC, Jeroen De Dauw
Details

Description Jeroen De Dauw 2012-11-28 16:50:31 UTC
Client currently has an apparent test coverage of 16%: http://wikidata-docs.wikimedia.de/testcoverage/phpcoverage/20121127/extensions_Wikibase.html

Many files are not even touched during test execution and are thus omitted. Real coverage is probably closer to 5%.

That's some serious technical debt we're building up, plus a rather big risk with regards to not catching bugs before deployment.
Comment 1 Jeroen De Dauw 2012-12-14 22:27:40 UTC
Created attachment 11518 [details]
Sad client is very sad
Comment 2 Lydia Pintscher 2013-10-08 17:13:14 UTC
What is the current status there?
Comment 3 Jeroen De Dauw 2013-10-08 18:16:28 UTC
Idk, our in-house coverage reporting is broken and I'm not able to run coverage myself without getting >9000 errors due to the nice spaghetti properties of the stuff in Wikibase.git. Presumably the coverage is up, though still having serious gaps.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links