Last modified: 2014-02-25 11:40:31 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 42296 - page history shows unreviewed revisions, reversions in wrong order
page history shows unreviewed revisions, reversions in wrong order
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
History/Diffs (Other open bugs)
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2012-11-20 18:28 UTC by Fomafix
Modified: 2014-02-25 11:40 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Fomafix 2012-11-20 18:28:16 UTC
The vandalism
was reverted in

The history contains these two versions in reverse order

(Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:19, 20. Nov. 2012‎ (Diskussion)‎ . . (61.254 Byte) (+7)‎ . . (→‎Epidemiologie) (rückgängig) [Markierung ausstehend]
(Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:19, 20. Nov. 2012‎ D (Diskussion | Beiträge)‎ K . . (61.247 Byte) (-7)‎ . . (Änderungen von (Diskussion) wurden auf die letzte Version von Buchexperte zurückgesetzt) (rückgängig) [automatisch gesichtet]
(Aktuell | Vorherige) 12:45, 20. Nov. 2012‎ Buchexperte (Diskussion | Beiträge)‎ K . . (61.247 Byte) (-5)‎ . . (Fix Überschriftenstruktur) (rückgängig) [automatisch gesichtet]
Comment 1 Alex Monk 2012-11-20 18:34:27 UTC
Looks like a FlaggedRevs problem, unreviewed revs are always shown at the top and I guess FR just didn't's revision as reverted for some reason.
Comment 2 Alex Monk 2012-11-20 18:35:03 UTC
didn't mark*
Comment 3 Umherirrender 2012-11-20 18:37:24 UTC
Looking at the seconds:

20. Nov. 2012, 16:19:34‎
20. Nov. 2012, 16:19:32‎ D 

But that means the inserting of the revision from was done 2 seconds after the revert, but without the revision, you cannot revert ??

Looking at the revids:

oldid=110726365 D

That means, the revision id of the ip was created earlier than the revert. Maybe User:D is using the IRC Feed, which was sent, but the revision was not ready inserted? Or the RecentChanges were faster than the revision table?
Comment 4 Sumana Harihareswara 2012-12-18 17:43:24 UTC
Has this been reproduced again within the last few weeks (in the current deployment cycle)?
Comment 5 Andre Klapper 2012-12-19 13:30:50 UTC
Code problem is very likely a dup of bug 2930, the instance where this happened could block bug 16660.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.