Last modified: 2014-02-25 11:40:31 UTC
The vandalism https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myokardinfarkt&oldid=110726356 was reverted in https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myokardinfarkt&oldid=110726365 The history contains these two versions in reverse order https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Myokardinfarkt&action=history (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:19, 20. Nov. 2012 178.2.15.57 (Diskussion) . . (61.254 Byte) (+7) . . (→Epidemiologie) (rückgängig) [Markierung ausstehend] (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:19, 20. Nov. 2012 D (Diskussion | Beiträge) K . . (61.247 Byte) (-7) . . (Änderungen von 178.2.15.57 (Diskussion) wurden auf die letzte Version von Buchexperte zurückgesetzt) (rückgängig) [automatisch gesichtet] (Aktuell | Vorherige) 12:45, 20. Nov. 2012 Buchexperte (Diskussion | Beiträge) K . . (61.247 Byte) (-5) . . (Fix Überschriftenstruktur) (rückgängig) [automatisch gesichtet]
Looks like a FlaggedRevs problem, unreviewed revs are always shown at the top and I guess FR just didn't 178.2.15.57's revision as reverted for some reason.
didn't mark*
Looking at the seconds: 20. Nov. 2012, 16:19:34 178.2.15.57 20. Nov. 2012, 16:19:32 D But that means the inserting of the revision from 178.2.15.57 was done 2 seconds after the revert, but without the revision, you cannot revert ?? Looking at the revids: oldid=110726356 178.2.15.57 oldid=110726365 D That means, the revision id of the ip was created earlier than the revert. Maybe User:D is using the IRC Feed, which was sent, but the revision was not ready inserted? Or the RecentChanges were faster than the revision table?
Has this been reproduced again within the last few weeks (in the current deployment cycle)?
Code problem is very likely a dup of bug 2930, the instance where this happened could block bug 16660.