Last modified: 2014-10-16 12:31:48 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T43424, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 41424 - flowRoot not supported by rsvg
flowRoot not supported by rsvg
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
SVG rendering (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Lowest minor with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
: upstream
: 5710 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: svg
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-10-26 12:43 UTC by Derk-Jan Hartman
Modified: 2014-10-16 12:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Derk-Jan Hartman 2012-10-26 12:43:08 UTC 
The flowRoot function is not supported by rsvg. This is reported upstream at:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634514
Comment 1 Derk-Jan Hartman 2012-10-26 13:55:11 UTC 
Another upstream ticket for this issue: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460904
Comment 2 PRO 2012-12-04 23:23:28 UTC 
Why you made a new bug report and converting [[Bugzilla: 5710]]? I've not found you bug and the description is not clear! Because it is not only not supported, it makes large full filled rectangles!
Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2012-12-04 23:26:39 UTC 
PRO: The description here is much much more clearer then the vague one in bug 5710. It happens that previously filed tickets cannot be find and that duplicates are created. It's not a problem at all if you don't find a bug immediately - you can file a new one and somebody at some point would mark duplicates as such.
Comment 4 PRO 2012-12-04 23:29:05 UTC 
Why you made a new bug report and converting Bugzilla:5710 ? I've not found your bug and the description/title is not clear! Because it is not only not supported, it makes large full filled rectangles! Most SVG editors don't know flowRoot.
Comment 5 Andre Klapper 2012-12-04 23:30:58 UTC 
PRO: Please avoid repetitive comments. I've already explained it in comment 3, plus nobody "converted" Bugzilla:5710. If something is unclear, feel free to send me a private email, as the Bugzilla workflow is not specific to the issue covered in this bug report. Thanks for your understanding!
Comment 6 PRO 2012-12-04 23:33:17 UTC 
Andre Klapper: I wanted to edit my post or delete what does not seem to appear.
Comment 7 PRO 2012-12-04 23:37:27 UTC 
Andre Klapper: I wanted to edit my post or delete what does not seem to appear. (editing work)
Comment 8 Andre Klapper 2012-12-04 23:39:07 UTC 
PRO: Stop commenting on this bug report. 
Send me private email instead. Thanks.
Comment 9 PRO 2012-12-17 17:22:34 UTC 
*** Bug 5710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 PRO 2014-10-15 23:05:53 UTC 
I propose the close this bug as WONTFIX. Because this flowRoot feature is not part of any SVG standard (it's only contained in a working draft of SVG 1.2) and its usage will almost certainly result in compatibility problems. 

It is also beneficial that this flowed text appears as black rectangle (or whatever) to see this false crap code immediately.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links