Last modified: 2014-02-12 23:35:44 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T43006, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 41006 - Tables in action=info should use more semantic tags
Tables in action=info should use more semantic tags
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Interface (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 38450
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-10-13 15:32 UTC by Liangent
Modified: 2014-02-12 23:35 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Liangent 2012-10-13 15:32:20 UTC 
Currently all of cells there are <td>s.
Comment 1 Liangent 2012-10-13 15:46:35 UTC 
Maybe the first column should be <th>, or the whole table should be replaced with <dl>?
Comment 2 Quim Gil 2013-03-09 19:52:21 UTC 
It is god to be more accurate in our HTML code, but what is the need for this?

Just trying to evaluate the relevance of the request before digging further. Thank you.
Comment 3 MZMcBride 2013-03-09 21:59:53 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> It is god to be more accurate in our HTML code, but what is the need for
> this?

This is an enhancement request. Who mentioned need?
Comment 4 Andre Klapper 2013-03-11 00:16:46 UTC 
If there's no good usecase there's no reason to ever consider implementation, and it's hard to come up with one that might be close to that unknown usecase. 

In general: Missing usecases can sometimes make bug reports INVALID in my opinion, and "Just because we can" is not a good argument.
Comment 5 Quim Gil 2013-11-19 15:41:33 UTC 
Liangent, do you stil think this is a good idea?

If so, is this bug a good candidate for Google Code-in?
 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Code-In
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links