Last modified: 2012-10-16 19:06:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T41015, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 39015 - Image width no longer limited to a sane value in edit mode
Image width no longer limited to a sane value in edit mode
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
ProofreadPage (Other open bugs)
master
All All
: High major (vote)
: MW 1.20 version
Assigned To: Tpt
:
: 37408 37563 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-08-03 17:31 UTC by Philippe Elie
Modified: 2012-10-16 19:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Philippe Elie 2012-08-03 17:31:46 UTC
This patch https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/extensions/ProofreadPage.git;a=commitdiff;h=911b74e6409756769635d06691155cec9732b00c removed a default limit on the image width in edit mode. This is a follow up of bug #33613. It wasn't a right fix, if for some reason the resolution is not enough Index allow to setup a default width on a per book setting, and if a site want a bigger resolution as a default, the proofreadPageDefaultEditWidth which was present before this patch would be used. This was not signaled because at a first glance people thought the slowdown was the usual problem coming from thumbnail generation.
Comment 2 Tpt 2012-08-03 17:53:27 UTC
Done: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/17598/
Comment 3 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2012-08-03 17:56:29 UTC
This was also mentioned at commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&oldid=75355976#Again_a_.28new.3F.29_trouble_managing_djvu_files
(I kept meaning to file a bug but kept forgetting)


In cases where zooming to that level would be useful, I would suggest starting off loading the smaller image size, and then fetching higer-rez images via js as they are (and only if) they are needed (Aka when people hit the zoom button).
Comment 4 Tpt 2012-08-24 17:20:01 UTC
*** Bug 37563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Tpt 2012-10-16 19:06:04 UTC
*** Bug 37408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links