Last modified: 2014-07-01 07:10:31 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T40614, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 38614 - Transclusion: Section edit links linked improperly on the transcluding wiki page
Transclusion: Section edit links linked improperly on the transcluding wiki page
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page editing (Other open bugs)
1.19.1
All All
: Normal major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
aklapper-moreinfo
:
Depends on:
Blocks: section-editing
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-07-23 21:14 UTC by technik
Modified: 2014-07-01 07:10 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description technik 2012-07-23 21:14:47 UTC 
Since MediaWiki 1.19 section edit links linked improperly on the transcluding page:
Skipping of sections of the transcluded page doesn't work (any more), the transcluded sections are numbered consecutively together with the sections of the transcluding page.
Section edit links of the transcluded sections are linked faultily to sections of the transcluding page and sections of the transcluding page beginning after transcluded content themselves are linked wrong.


MediaWiki 1.19.1
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2013-01-15 14:31:16 UTC 
Hi technik! Sorry that nobody has taken a look at this report yet and given feedback.
Is there a public testcase for this that you could point to?
Comment 2 Andre Klapper 2013-04-11 13:17:26 UTC 
Hi technik! Is there a public testcase for this that you could point to?
Comment 3 This, that and the other (TTO) 2014-07-01 07:10:31 UTC 
Closing this.

The issue in comment 0 sounds fairly major (a regression, nonetheless). But since no-one else has complained in 2 years, it can't be that much of an issue.

Additionally, the reporter didn't respond to questions; only he/she knows what is meant by this bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links