Last modified: 2013-04-30 12:57:07 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T40459, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 38459 - Users can mark a single piece of feedback as [un]helpful multiple times
Users can mark a single piece of feedback as [un]helpful multiple times
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
ArticleFeedbackv5 (Other open bugs)
master
All All
: Normal major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Matthias Mullie
:
: 43208 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 39043
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-07-17 22:48 UTC by Oliver Keyes
Modified: 2013-04-30 12:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Screenshot (188.22 KB, image/png)
2012-07-17 22:48 UTC, Oliver Keyes
Details

Description Oliver Keyes 2012-07-17 22:48:14 UTC
Created attachment 10852 [details]
Screenshot

See screenshot. He can evidently mark feedback as unhelpful repeatedly, despite it being the same piece.
Comment 2 Andre Klapper 2013-01-09 09:15:43 UTC
*** Bug 43208 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 spage 2013-03-12 21:30:02 UTC
What's actually happening from the screenshot is marking it unhelpful, changing your mind and UN-marking as unhelpful, repeat.  That's a legitimate activity the first few times, though a little wasteful to log. The UI should clarify its behavior so some user doesn't repeatedly click thinking she is plus-3'ing or minus-4'ing some brilliant/awful feedback. For example, tooltip on the icon could show [Click to un-mark as unhelpful] or [Undo your marking as helpful], AFT could immediately give feedback showing the action, etc.
Comment 4 Matthias Mullie 2013-04-30 12:56:58 UTC
There's no reliable way to be certain that an anonymous user has up/down-voted already, so it could theoretically still occur with anon users, since we rely on cookies for this.
This was a problem with the javascript however, which resulted in quite a decent amount of consecutive up/down-votes like this. This problem has already been solved for awhile now though.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links