Last modified: 2013-09-11 20:54:17 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T39732, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 37732 - Wikimedia Commons needs a built-in raster image editor / photo editor
Wikimedia Commons needs a built-in raster image editor / photo editor
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Extensions requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: commons
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-06-20 02:39 UTC by MZMcBride
Modified: 2013-09-11 20:54 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description MZMcBride 2012-06-20 02:39:48 UTC 
Wikimedia Commons has no built-in image editor currently. It should have a built-in image editor that allows images to be rotated, cropped, etc.

This is related to bug 7757.
Comment 1 Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia 2012-09-28 16:29:24 UTC 
If Bug 28700 would be fixed, one could at least use a canvas for image manipulation (unfortunately there is only PNG export in some browsers, but one could "grab the pixels" and then JPEG encode, which in turn would be very slow but could work as a background worker) and offering something much more powerful for SVG editing (Bug 38271) without having to install anything on the server except (static) files. (There are solutions around that work 100% at the client side after the application and the file was loaded.) One could also attempt to manipulate JPEG (and the attached metadata) using JavaScript directly. All this requires modern browsers and huge JS libraries. I guess you don't want to process everything at the server...
Comment 2 Andre Klapper 2013-03-21 08:59:20 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> If Bug 28700 would be fixed

Rainer: It is now.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2013-09-11 20:54:17 UTC 
Added some keywords to summary to make this bug more findable.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links