Last modified: 2012-01-16 07:26:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35635, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.

Bug 33635 - Liquid Thread activation on meta


Summary:	Liquid Thread activation on meta

Status:	RESOLVED INVALID

Product:	Wikimedia
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Extension setup (Other open bugs)
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	Unprioritized enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody - You can work on this!

URL:	https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.ph...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	19699
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-01-10 11:13 UTC by schiste
Modified:	2012-01-16 07:26 UTC (History)
CC List:	8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser:	---
Mobile Platform:	---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description schiste 2012-01-10 11:13:47 UTC

Hi,

Discussions on meta tends to be rather long. It's one of the purpose of this wiki. Having Liquid Thread enabled would really ease reading those long discussions. 

Thanks a lot,

Christophe

Comment 1 p858snake 2012-01-10 11:15:06 UTC

Please show a link to community consensus for this change.

Comment 2 schiste 2012-01-10 11:17:16 UTC

Would you be ok with people supporting it directly here ? Or you want it to happen on meta ?

Comment 3 p858snake 2012-01-10 11:20:44 UTC

Meta would be better.

Comment 4 Yair Rand 2012-01-10 23:46:47 UTC

Similar requests have been closed even though there was community consensus. LQT deployments were considered "on hold" until the re-engineering was complete. See Bug 19699#c10. Has this status changed?

Comment 5 Nemo 2012-01-11 01:43:28 UTC

Per comment 4, closing INVALID for lack of consensus (at least now), you can close it as LATER if a community consensus arises.

Comment 6 Jan Kucera (Kozuch) 2012-01-15 16:33:09 UTC

Wiki consensused suck. +1 for meta liquidthreads from me.

Comment 7 Niklas Laxström 2012-01-15 17:22:21 UTC

Not sure if this is a good idea, LQT barely works with latest MediaWiki anymore.

Comment 8 Aude 2012-01-15 17:47:30 UTC

ugh!  sorry, LQT is disorienting, and I find it harder and takes longer to skim the pages and read the comments. I'd prefer LQT to be improved more, with active WMF support, before it's enabled on meta.  It could just be me, though, that dislikes LQT.

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Search

Personal tools

Navigation

Links