Last modified: 2012-01-16 07:26:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35635, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 33635 - Liquid Thread activation on meta
Liquid Thread activation on meta
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Extension setup (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.ph...
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 19699
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-01-10 11:13 UTC by schiste
Modified: 2012-01-16 07:26 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description schiste 2012-01-10 11:13:47 UTC
Hi,

Discussions on meta tends to be rather long. It's one of the purpose of this wiki. Having Liquid Thread enabled would really ease reading those long discussions. 

Thanks a lot,

Christophe
Comment 1 p858snake 2012-01-10 11:15:06 UTC
Please show a link to community consensus for this change.
Comment 2 schiste 2012-01-10 11:17:16 UTC
Would you be ok with people supporting it directly here ? Or you want it to happen on meta ?
Comment 3 p858snake 2012-01-10 11:20:44 UTC
Meta would be better.
Comment 4 Yair Rand 2012-01-10 23:46:47 UTC
Similar requests have been closed even though there was community consensus. LQT deployments were considered "on hold" until the re-engineering was complete. See Bug 19699#c10. Has this status changed?
Comment 5 Nemo 2012-01-11 01:43:28 UTC
Per comment 4, closing INVALID for lack of consensus (at least now), you can close it as LATER if a community consensus arises.
Comment 6 Jan Kucera (Kozuch) 2012-01-15 16:33:09 UTC
Wiki consensused suck. +1 for meta liquidthreads from me.
Comment 7 Niklas Laxström 2012-01-15 17:22:21 UTC
Not sure if this is a good idea, LQT barely works with latest MediaWiki anymore.
Comment 8 Aude 2012-01-15 17:47:30 UTC
ugh!  sorry, LQT is disorienting, and I find it harder and takes longer to skim the pages and read the comments. I'd prefer LQT to be improved more, with active WMF support, before it's enabled on meta.  It could just be me, though, that dislikes LQT.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links