Last modified: 2011-11-20 00:31:23 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T34507, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 32507 - EXIF orientation processing might lead to double rotation
EXIF orientation processing might lead to double rotation
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 6672
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
File management (Other open bugs)
1.18.x
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-11-19 23:28 UTC by OrganStoff
Modified: 2011-11-20 00:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description OrganStoff 2011-11-19 23:28:22 UTC
Recently with Bug 6672 EXIF orientiation processing was added to MediaWiki. But this has some harmful effects: there are examples where a JPEG image has already been rotated losslessly without changing the EXIF orientation tag. This leads to the effect, that the image gets rotated again when imported to MediaWiki.

Here are two examples:
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Pfaender.jpg&oldid=33252498
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sender_Regensburg-Ziegetsberg&oldid=96177510

One may argue that the EXIF orientation tag should not be processed by wikimedia at all, because the problem has to be eliminated at the source: people should losslessly rotate their pictures with appropriate tools before even uploading them to the internet.
Comment 1 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2011-11-20 00:31:23 UTC
I'm going to dupe this with bug 6672, as that's where most of the pro/con image rotation support argumentation went on.

Bugzilla isn't really the best place to have an extended argument as to if a feature should or should not be implemented (Bugzilla should more work towards fixing problems that we know are problems, debates as to if something is a problem should be elsewhere. Perhaps wikitech-l (?)


As an aside, if one particular community really hates it, and has community consensus that its not a good thing, I suppose we could set $wgEnableAutoRotation to false for just that wiki.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6672 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links