Last modified: 2014-10-03 06:13:02 UTC
Pdf export doesn't support {{formatnum:}} and {{formatnum: |R}} in english wiki it doesn't show decimal separators http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AReza1615%2Fpdf&action=historysubmit&diff=447504296&oldid=447501002 in fa.wiki it has error http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1:Reza1615/pdf2 in it.wiki doesn't show decimal separators http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Reza1615/pdf
in it.wiki also it has wrong calculation (third item)
This bug has not been touched in at least six months. With this in mind, I've been asked by the bugmeister to bump this bug's priority down from "High". Concerns can be addressed to mah@everybody.org.
I've implemented a much better formatnum today. the administrators still need to install the needed locales however...english should work pretty good.
locales have been installed. our code may still choose the wrong locale, i.e. it uses it_CH-UTF-8 for it.wikipedia.org, since it_IT isn't available. strictly speaking I don't know which locale to use based on the language. the code is guessing and using what's available.
for fa.wiki it doesn't change still it is not working
Can you tell me exactly what's the input, what's the output mediawiki produces, and what's produced in the pdf? ASCII characters only please.
in http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1:Reza1615/pdf2 the 3th & 4th lines {{formatnum:{{formatnum:۱۲۳۴|R}}}} =۱٬۲۳۴ {{formatnum:1234}}=۱٬۲۳۴ pdf export should render ۱٬۲۳۴ or 1٬234 (if it doesn't support Persian number at least it should show ٬) but now it renders 1234
Someone reported this problem on English Wikipedia village pump (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29&oldid=537991822#Insidious_problem_with_pdf_rendering), along with a work-around (moving a period outside formatnum).
Thanks for new version
(In reply to reza1615 from comment #9) > Thanks for new version To clarify, did you test the output of the new renderer and verify this bug was fixed?
(In reply to Nemo from comment #10) > (In reply to reza1615 from comment #9) > > Thanks for new version > > To clarify, did you test the output of the new renderer and verify this bug > was fixed? Yes. I reported this bug. I tested http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1:Reza1615/pdf2 and http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Reza1615/pdf and they are OK
