Last modified: 2005-07-14 21:30:05 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 2860 - timestamps are either not reliable or not properly set up
timestamps are either not reliable or not properly set up
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
PC Windows XP
: Normal major with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-07-14 21:26 UTC by lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט
Modified: 2005-07-14 21:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט 2005-07-14 21:26:40 UTC

Accurat and universal time stamps are quite important especially in a case like
elections for the board.
shows the timestamp as

< Elections for the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, 2005
Revision as of 05:55, July 13, 2005; view current revision
←Older revision | Newer revision→

The message itself contains
09:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

    Election Officials, Wikimedia Election Committee 

My note there has the timestamp

* I thing that more care should be payed to these issues especially in a case
like these elections. Please compare also with the timestamp of this note. Best
regards Gangleri | Th | T 21:20, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Please comment at that page. Thanks in advance!

Best regards Reinhardt [[user:gangleri]]
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2005-07-14 21:30:05 UTC
So, somebody signed it with ~~~~ a month previously. So what?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.