Last modified: 2012-04-16 09:16:09 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T29519, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 27519 - Parser tricks like </noin</includeonly>clude> don't work
Parser tricks like </noin</includeonly>clude> don't work
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 27467
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Templates (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-02-18 02:53 UTC by folengo
Modified: 2012-04-16 09:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description folengo 2011-02-18 02:53:23 UTC
See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Categories_for_discussion/preload

I could reproduce the same bug on the French Wikipedia with a different template.
Comment 1 DieBuche 2011-02-18 18:41:46 UTC
Please be more exact with your descriptions. How this: </noin</includeonly>clude> supposed to work?
Comment 2 folengo 2011-02-20 12:01:07 UTC
The table at the top of the page is not supposed to be included into the monthly log, such as [[Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/02]]. 

See also the older version at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Category_for_discussion&diff=prev&oldid=49950547 showing how the page used to be used.

Template:Category_for_discussion in turn is called by {{subst:Cfd}}.
Comment 3 folengo 2011-02-20 12:02:33 UTC
Also, I forgot to say that this is not an old bug discovered only a few days ago. It is a new bug that suddenly showed up in February 2011. 

This is a Mediawiki regression.

Everything was fine until a few days ago.
Comment 4 DieBuche 2011-02-20 13:29:12 UTC
Teofilo please, next Time: State what is happening, state what should be happening, not just error, doesn't work etc.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 27467 ***
Comment 5 folengo 2011-02-22 09:16:13 UTC
Sju had written "The template produces some nonsenses like the example below. --ŠJů (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)", and provided a copy-paste of the garbage on the talk page I linked. I thought this was enough explanation.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links