Last modified: 2010-09-25 11:38:40 UTC
ArticleAssessmentPilot hasn't been properly launched, but the API is live and functioning, so I tested it. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=articleassessment&aapageid=19161823 As the above link shows, [[User:Gurch]] now scores 9999 out of 5 for sourcing. Validating the ratings might be wise.
It has, it's been live since mid this week. See https://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/22/article-feedback-pilot-goes-live/ and it's inclusion category http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Article_Feedback_Pilot The API isn't really designed for end user interaction... Also foreach( $wgArticleAssessmentRatings as $rating ) { $ret["r{$rating}"] = array( ApiBase::PARAM_TYPE => 'integer', ApiBase::PARAM_DFLT => 0, ApiBase::PARAM_MIN => 0, ApiBase::PARAM_MAX => 5, ); } The module is offloading the parameter validation to the core API, so it would seem it's a core API bug.. At a guess, it's due to there being no MAX2 CC'ing Roan.
Scrap the MAX2 coment, that's only the case for 'limit' type.
r73742 As per the CR, "Maybe we should have a PARAM_MAX_ENFORCE. Rather than just warning!"
r73743 actually, goddamit!