Last modified: 2011-07-06 20:01:41 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T26616, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 24616 - Please enable LiquidThreads on cs.wikipedia
Please enable LiquidThreads on cs.wikipedia
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on: 21903
Blocks: 19699
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2010-08-01 01:44 UTC by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
Modified: 2011-07-06 20:01 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Jan Kucera (Kozuch) 2010-08-01 01:44:16 UTC 
Few users are willing to use this extension - it will be only turned on a volunteer bases at selected personal talk pages.

We need to translate the namespaces prior installation (bug #21903). Proposed namespaces translations are:
"Thread" > "Vlákno"
"Summary" > "Shrnutí"

Relevant discussion in Czech is here: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedie:Pod_l%C3%ADpou_%28technika%29#Diskusn.C3.AD_syst.C3.A9m_LiquidThreads
Comment 1 MZMcBride 2010-08-01 01:49:27 UTC 
Make sure you've followed all the steps listed here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requesting_wiki_configuration_changes
Comment 2 Danny B. 2010-08-01 18:47:01 UTC 
Absolutely no consensus for this. Activity of a single person.

Closing as invalid.
Comment 3 Jan Kucera (Kozuch) 2010-08-02 08:40:44 UTC 
I will reopen this bug once it will become actual again. I guess there is not a deep consesnus needed, because the feature will be enabled by personal preference only. Few users said already they will use this, which is enought in my opinion. However, to proceed in line with current standards, I will make a call for voting to a deeper consensus.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links