Last modified: 2013-07-25 09:51:00 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 23216 - Move the Nourmande Wikipedia from nrm to roa-x-norman
Move the Nourmande Wikipedia from nrm to roa-x-norman
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Halsell
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.wik...
: ops
Depends on:
Blocks: wikis-to-rename
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-04-17 00:45 UTC by Casey Brown
Modified: 2013-07-25 09:51 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Casey Brown 2010-04-17 00:45:34 UTC
Please change the Nourmande Wikipedia's language code from "nrm" to "roa-x-norman".  "nrm" is Narom, a language from Malaysia... Brion suggested that we use the generic Romance code with an extension tag instead.

This was discussed on wikitech-l, see the URL for more information.
Comment 1 Robin Pepermans (SPQRobin) 2011-04-21 11:41:29 UTC
I think "roa-x-nrm" or "roa-nrm" would be better to keep consistency with other codes with 3-letter extension tags like "be-x-old", "cbk-zam", "fiu-vro", "roa-rup", etc.
Comment 2 Danny B. 2011-04-21 11:56:54 UTC
Even easier would be to close it, as it is inactive. Only bots, global maintenance scripts, vandalisms (and reverts of it), interwiki changes. No content progress.
Comment 3 Sam Reed (reedy) 2013-03-14 21:34:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Even easier would be to close it, as it is inactive. Only bots, global
> maintenance scripts, vandalisms (and reverts of it), interwiki changes. No
> content progress.

Fancy putting the request in to do this, then we can easily close it?
Comment 4 Milos Rancic 2013-03-14 22:46:12 UTC
Should be changed with a year of redirect for compatibility. At the other side, it's not likely that we'll get Narom Wikipedia during this decade.
Comment 5 Daniel Zahn 2013-03-14 23:19:27 UTC
then we can as well just redirect it forever. one year is just a random number and if we have to redirect anyways we just have to touch it twice to then remove that again
Comment 6 Milos Rancic 2013-03-14 23:28:41 UTC
One year of permanent redirect would synchronize search engines. One year should be enough for that (or you could put any other reasonable time for synchronization). And it could happen that we get request for Narom Wikipedia at some moment of time.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links