Last modified: 2012-05-03 22:18:16 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T22721, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 20721 - Add abusefilter-viewprivate to administrator userright on the English Wikipedia
Add abusefilter-viewprivate to administrator userright on the English Wikipedia
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Halsell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedi...
: shell
: 20769 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-09-18 13:09 UTC by xenocidic
Modified: 2012-05-03 22:18 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description xenocidic 2009-09-18 13:09:33 UTC
I actually thought this was done in https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19362 but it seems that just created the right.

Please add abusefilter-viewprivate to the administrator userright package on English Wikipedia so admins can view private filters without having to grant themselves a separate userright.
Comment 1 Cenarium 2009-09-25 18:02:47 UTC
*** Bug 20769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Andrew Garrett 2009-09-29 17:51:03 UTC
In response to Brion at bug 20769 <https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20769#c1>
> Andrew, is this safe to do or do we need to keep that more restricted? Any
> alternatives that are safer?

This is perfectly safe, it's just the same right that administrators can self-assign by giving themselves the abusefilter group.
Comment 3 Rich Farmbrough 2009-10-06 18:24:27 UTC
Yes it is "safe", but having to self assign the right might make some more careful about how they use it, to encourage them to request a filter rather than rolling their own.  And make no mistake, filers are one of the most powerful tools around.
Comment 4 xenocidic 2009-10-06 18:34:30 UTC
Rich, this is for /viewing/, not editing filters. The whole point is to allow admins (like me) who don't edit much to still be able to view without polluting Special:Listusers/AbuseFilterEditors with a bunch of admins who don't actually edit it.
Comment 5 Cenarium 2009-10-07 17:51:15 UTC
Admins need frequently to view private filters for example when handling AIV reports based on abuse filters, especially those from Mr.Z-bot. This way, admins won't need the filter editor rights to see them.
Comment 6 Rich Farmbrough 2009-10-09 17:06:46 UTC
Ah, xenocidic, I stand corrected. In that case it seems eminently sensible. 
Comment 7 MZMcBride 2009-12-04 00:27:54 UTC
I think enabling this right per-project is a waste of time. Just do it globally. Nobody is going to object to admin viewing of AbuseFilter filters, surely.
Comment 8 Roan Kattouw 2009-12-24 13:37:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> I think enabling this right per-project is a waste of time. Just do it
> globally. Nobody is going to object to admin viewing of AbuseFilter filters,
> surely.
> 

Done for enwiki, stayed out of the rest of the wikis' configs for now.
Comment 9 Roan Kattouw 2010-04-19 08:24:49 UTC
Mass-unassigning shell bugs from myself to Rob; I used to do them once, but I
don't have time for them any more.
Comment 10 Rob Halsell 2011-04-06 17:08:47 UTC
I am not going to assign this to all wikis, when it was originally a request for a single project, and no other projects are asking for it.

The original request was fufilled, closing ticket.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links