Last modified: 2014-09-23 22:41:50 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T17494, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 15494 - Add new sections to the top of a page on a site-wide basis
Add new sections to the top of a page on a site-wide basis
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 31919
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Extensions requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://wiki.montcopa.org/TestWiki
: easy
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-09-06 01:31 UTC by Jack D. Pond
Modified: 2014-09-23 22:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Configuration option for CommentAtTop of Talk (747 bytes, patch)
2008-09-06 01:41 UTC, Jack D. Pond
Details
Patch for trunk (revision 40580) (747 bytes, patch)
2008-09-07 17:04 UTC, Jack D. Pond
Details

Description Jack D. Pond 2008-09-06 01:31:33 UTC
Add a configuration option that would allow sites to post new comments at the top (rather than the bottom) of talk [discussion] pages.

I've seen several requests to put new comments [+] at the top of user discussion pages rather than at the bottom so that original comments appear in reverse chronological order, newest to oldest.

Patch is extremely simple (see attached).

This would only affect the section='new' so, microscopic performance impact and would not impact existing talk pages.

Negative is it adds another $wg option ($wgNewCommentFirst).

Activated by adding to LocalSettings.php:

$wgNewCommentFirst = true;

Possible permutations might include:

* Adding to user preference
* Tag activated (by page)
Comment 1 Jack D. Pond 2008-09-06 01:41:45 UTC
Created attachment 5295 [details]
Configuration option for CommentAtTop of Talk
Comment 2 Jack D. Pond 2008-09-07 17:04:25 UTC
Created attachment 5301 [details]
Patch for trunk (revision 40580)

Added attachment to current trunk
Comment 3 p858snake 2011-04-30 00:09:58 UTC
*Bulk BZ Change: +Patch to open bugs with patches attached that are missing the keyword*
Comment 4 Sumana Harihareswara 2011-11-10 02:13:06 UTC
Jack, thanks for your patch, and I'm sorry it's taken so long for you to get a response.  I've added the "need-review" keyword here to signal that developers should take a look and review your code.
Comment 5 Jack D. Pond 2011-11-10 02:17:40 UTC
Sumana,  this was a blast from the past.  I'm not sure worth reviewing at this point - Talk is being replaced with liquid threads, right?
Comment 6 Sumana Harihareswara 2011-11-11 14:40:05 UTC
The hope is that eventually LiquidThreads will be a suitable replacement, yes.  But I think it's still worth working on Talk and improving it in the meanwhile.
Comment 7 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2012-01-05 14:02:18 UTC
We now (as of 1.19) have PlaceNewSection hook that allows extensions to modify where new sections are placed (And one extension does something similar to this request - [[mw:Extension:PlaceNewSection]]).

Since this can be trivially be done by an extension, I would be in favour of closing this bug and getting people to use an extension (I could write said extension if folks want).
Comment 8 Sumana Harihareswara 2012-10-12 01:26:27 UTC
Comment on attachment 5301 [details]
Patch for trunk (revision 40580)

Marking patch as obsolete given information bawolff gave in most recent comment.
Comment 9 Sumana Harihareswara 2012-10-12 01:27:01 UTC
removing keywords.

Oliver, would you be interested in this as a Micro Design Improvement?
Comment 10 Oliver Keyes 2012-10-13 04:28:55 UTC
Not directly, I'm afraid. I can't see any demand for this from within the community, and we're primarily directed towards editor retention and engagement issues. Sorry :(
Comment 11 MZMcBride 2012-10-19 17:49:42 UTC
This bug is related to bug 31919 ("Allow posting new sections to top of page on a per-page basis").
Comment 12 Andre Klapper 2014-02-19 11:21:09 UTC
(In reply to Bawolff (Brian Wolff) from comment #7)
> We now (as of 1.19) have PlaceNewSection hook that allows extensions to
> modify where new sections are placed (And one extension does something
> similar to this request - [[mw:Extension:PlaceNewSection]]).
> 
> Since this can be trivially be done by an extension, I would be in favour of
> closing this bug and getting people to use an extension (I could write said
> extension if folks want).

=> moving to Extension requests; does not look like core territory.
Comment 13 Jack D. Pond 2014-02-19 12:55:12 UTC
Agreed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 31919 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links