Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:04:31 UTC
Created attachment 4200 [details] Patch with fix I think it's text/xml, not application/xml.
P.S. application/xml is also valid, but some browsers don't understand it, so text/xml is more compatible
Why do you want it understood by the browser? It's xml for an specific subset of applications. text/xml would imho be misleading.
I'm inclined to wontfix; application/xml seems entirely correct. Can you give an example where a) it makes a difference and b) it seems desireable?
(In reply to comment #3) > I'm inclined to wontfix; application/xml seems entirely correct. > > Can you give an example where a) it makes a difference and b) it seems > desireable? > Okay, I think there's no differnce. The only difference is in menaing. So WONTFIX