Last modified: 2006-12-27 22:53:50 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 8404 - Dynamic dates should be distinct from linked dates
Dynamic dates should be distinct from linked dates
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 4582
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
PC Windows XP
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-12-27 22:52 UTC by Omegatron
Modified: 2006-12-27 22:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Omegatron 2006-12-27 22:52:50 UTC
We have this "dynamic dates" feature, which is great.  It makes 2006-01-24 look
like January 24, 2006 because of the way I have my preferences set, for
instance.  But in order to get it to display like that, you have to link the
date, which is silly.  Why link?  We aren't linking to the article about the
date.  It would be much more logical and usable if linking of dates was distinct
from dynamic formatting of dates.  I see two possibilities, in order of preference:

* All dates, linked or otherwise, are automatically detected and dynamically
formatted.  Use nowiki tags when needed (like direct quotes).
* Dynamic date formatting only applies when a date has some kind of wikimarkup,
like //January 24, 2006//.
Comment 1 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2006-12-27 22:53:50 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4582 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links