Last modified: 2006-12-03 04:25:41 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T6712, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 4712 - Edit summaries are set to a character limit which is too low
Edit summaries are set to a character limit which is too low
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 4714
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
History/Diffs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
: 6788 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-01-22 07:37 UTC by marudubshinki
Modified: 2006-12-03 04:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description marudubshinki 2006-01-22 07:37:27 UTC
I frequently justify long and complex changes in a single diff to ease reviewing
them, and I find that the current limit of a few hundred characters (or whatever
the exact count is) is too low, and I am forced to resort to awkward
abbreviations and runningwordstogether. ex.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linux_kernel&diff=36158791&oldid=36158278

I can't think of any downsides to lengthening the max character count except
perhaps the buffer being filled up with garbage/copyvios/offensive material, but
as the current length allows for that, and we've already seen some abuse where
anons added in privacy-violating material, I do not think this will enable many
ill uses.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2006-01-22 07:45:56 UTC
Edit comments are meant to be short and to the point. Long, 
detailed discussion belongs on a talk page, where users can 
communicate back and forth.

Resolving WONTFIX.
Comment 2 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2006-01-22 08:31:23 UTC
REOPENING after a discussion on IRC and marking it as a duplicate of bug 4714
Comment 3 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2006-01-22 08:31:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4714 ***
Comment 4 Rob Church 2006-12-03 04:25:41 UTC
*** Bug 6788 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links