Last modified: 2005-05-15 01:09:10 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 1901 - Automated transwiki system
Automated transwiki system
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 606
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-04-16 05:38 UTC by kelvSYC
Modified: 2005-05-15 01:09 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description kelvSYC 2005-04-16 05:38:40 UTC
Perhaps an automated system of moving pages across Wikis as per [[m:Transwiki]]
is in order, that could preserve page histories and such.
Comment 1 Edward Z. Yang 2005-05-14 23:26:48 UTC
More thoughts on this idea:

First of all, this is in desperate need for Wikisource, which is going to be
splitting up into multiple language domains. The current consensus is that it is
too tedious to get a developer to manually move the transwiki pages, so they're
going to create full copies of the database and delete them (as deletion doesn't
require developer powers but full-transwiki'ing does). If a feature like this
could be pushed for just the Mediawiki installation in Wikisource, it would
prove un-imaginabaly useful. Please consider our plight, lest we end up deleting
4000+ articles in each copy! :(

All we need is:

* Data format for exporting page histories besides an SQL dump
* Admin tool to import this data format as a new page.

That's it! I don't think it's too much to ask (although that is always said with
reservations as I have no clue what you guys are working on). Once again, Please
Consider! I'm voting for this bug.
Comment 2 Brion Vibber 2005-05-15 01:09:10 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 606 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links