Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:04:31 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 11531 - Fix MIME type for Special:Export
Fix MIME type for Special:Export
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest trivial (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: easy
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-10-02 04:03 UTC by Victor Vasiliev
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:04 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Patch with fix (617 bytes, patch)
2007-10-02 04:03 UTC, Victor Vasiliev
Details

Description Victor Vasiliev 2007-10-02 04:03:13 UTC
Created attachment 4200 [details]
Patch with fix

I think it's text/xml, not application/xml.
Comment 1 Victor Vasiliev 2007-10-02 13:09:48 UTC
P.S. application/xml is also valid, but some browsers don't understand it, so text/xml is more compatible
Comment 2 Platonides 2007-10-02 13:13:58 UTC
Why do you want it understood by the browser?
It's xml for an specific subset of applications. text/xml would imho be misleading.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2007-10-02 15:06:29 UTC
I'm inclined to wontfix; application/xml seems entirely correct.

Can you give an example where a) it makes a difference and b) it seems desireable?
Comment 4 Victor Vasiliev 2007-10-02 16:50:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm inclined to wontfix; application/xml seems entirely correct.
> 
> Can you give an example where a) it makes a difference and b) it seems
> desireable?
> 

Okay, I think there's no differnce. The only difference is in menaing. So WONTFIX

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links