Last modified: 2007-07-20 14:41:18 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 10646 - Last-modified date at bottom of page sometimes one revision outdated (but page up-to-date)
Last-modified date at bottom of page sometimes one revision outdated (but pag...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 6263
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-07-19 21:55 UTC by Volker Alexander
Modified: 2007-07-20 14:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Volker Alexander 2007-07-19 21:55:14 UTC
this one refers to at least the german wikipedia (I didn't test it on other ones):
In the bottom part of every article is a time stamp. I recently saw several articles, which showed the up-to-date-content (text, pics etc.), but had an old time stamp - to be more precisely: the second newest one. Even when I was choosing the newest version of the article on the versions-page, I could see the newest text but an old date+time (although I clicked on the version of a newer date).
After I found this, I started editing such articles: per one edit+save I added one word or so and waited some minutes in between. I found out, that the after saving automatically reloaded page showed the time stamp of the pre-previous edit (which means the one before the last one (that led to the last refresh)).
I'm not using a proxy, and I'm emptiing my cache.
Comment 1 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-07-19 23:31:52 UTC
I picked a few random pages and didn't see this.  How many articles have this wrong timestamp?
Comment 2 Volker Alexander 2007-07-20 10:52:21 UTC
I had this for example on:
The last change someone else made was adding the sentence:
"Alte Trivialnamen sind Aldimin für das N-Analogon eines Aldehyds und Ketimin für das N-Analogon eines Ketons."
That was:
on 25.6.2007, 11:05
after that, I made two little changes: one komma (,) to semikolon (;), one capital p in a small one (protoniert).
Last change was:
on 18.7.2007, 22:55,
but the article shows:
Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 18. Juli 2007 um 22:53 Uhr geändert.
As you can see, this is wrong.

2. example:
The versions-page shows:
as the latest version, on 18.7.2007, 23:04,
but the article shows again the second latest version time stamp:
Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 18. Juli 2007 um 22:57 Uhr geändert.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2007-07-20 14:41:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6263 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.