Last modified: 2007-07-20 14:41:18 UTC
Hi, this one refers to at least the german wikipedia (I didn't test it on other ones): In the bottom part of every article is a time stamp. I recently saw several articles, which showed the up-to-date-content (text, pics etc.), but had an old time stamp - to be more precisely: the second newest one. Even when I was choosing the newest version of the article on the versions-page, I could see the newest text but an old date+time (although I clicked on the version of a newer date). After I found this, I started editing such articles: per one edit+save I added one word or so and waited some minutes in between. I found out, that the after saving automatically reloaded page showed the time stamp of the pre-previous edit (which means the one before the last one (that led to the last refresh)). I'm not using a proxy, and I'm emptiing my cache. Greetings, Volker
I picked a few random pages and didn't see this. How many articles have this wrong timestamp?
I had this for example on: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imine The last change someone else made was adding the sentence: "Alte Trivialnamen sind Aldimin für das N-Analogon eines Aldehyds und Ketimin für das N-Analogon eines Ketons." That was: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imine&oldid=33596105 on 25.6.2007, 11:05 after that, I made two little changes: one komma (,) to semikolon (;), one capital p in a small one (protoniert). Last change was: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imine&oldid=34539646 on 18.7.2007, 22:55, but the article shows: Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 18. Juli 2007 um 22:53 Uhr geändert. As you can see, this is wrong. 2. example: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNF-Stretching The versions-page shows: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PNF-Stretching&oldid=34539953 as the latest version, on 18.7.2007, 23:04, but the article shows again the second latest version time stamp: Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 18. Juli 2007 um 22:57 Uhr geändert. Greetings, Volker
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6263 ***
