Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T2879, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.

Bug 879 - Should the order between "*", ":" (etc. ?) and anchors be relevant?

Summary:	Should the order between "*", ":" (etc. ?) and anchors be relevant?

Status: RESOLVED INVALID Product: MediaWiki Classification: Unclassified Component: General/Unknown (Other open bugs) Version: 1.4.x Hardware: PC Windows XP Importance: Normal minor (vote) Target Milestone: --- Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this! URL: http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_t... Whiteboard: Keywords: Depends on: Blocks:   Show dependency tree / graph		Reported: 2004-11-14 07:57 UTC by lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט Modified: 2010-05-15 15:33 UTC (History) CC List: 1 user (show) gangleri See Also: Web browser: --- Mobile Platform: --- Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט 2004-11-14 07:57:14 UTC The tests show that the order between (multiple) "*" or (multiple) ":" and - <div id="..." /> and <font id="..." /> style anchors is relevant. - <!--- bla bla ---> comments is not. I know this behavior also from 1.3.7. Regards Reinhardt Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2004-12-11 23:01:22 UTC Can't see anything wrong with it. If you report bugs like this, you *MUST* provide: 1) isolated individual cases, *not* a giant page with a million items 2) A detailed explanation of what was expected, and how it differs from what was found.