Last modified: 2014-10-02 15:56:26 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T73485, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 71485 - Find a better solution for a "clickable image" on file pages
Find a better solution for a "clickable image" on file pages
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
File management (Other open bugs)
1.25-git
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-09-30 21:56 UTC by Florian
Modified: 2014-10-02 15:56 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Florian 2014-09-30 21:56:16 UTC
Currently, on a file page, the entire image is clickable and redirects to the image itself.

I agree with Jon (refer to the bug 48996):
"Why don't we place a transparent icon (magnifying glass maybe?) in the top right corner that when clicked opens the image. I don't believe the entire image needs to be clickable I just think we should do a better job at surfacing the image link."

I hope we can discuss a possible solution for that. There are still two changes in gerrit, related to MobileFrontend, maybe we can use this as a basis, maybe not :)

I34c930e6f15eaec99834eaa6948b1c41029af247
I9235fdfd53392fdf741ceab7b0ca204bd9f8eb78
Comment 1 Jon 2014-09-30 23:37:11 UTC
Specifically, in mobile it is very easy to accidentally tap an image and unintentionally download a large resolution photo. It's also not clear from a UX perspective what clicking on it would do.

Some of our users have limited data plans and this can be quite costly for them. Given we have an `original file` link it seems surplus.
Comment 2 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2014-10-01 00:59:50 UTC
> 
> Some of our users have limited data plans and this can be quite costly for
> them. Given we have an `original file` link it seems surplus.

In extreme cases, downloading a multi gigabyte file on desktop is sometimes not fun either. Certain very large jpg files have been known to crash certain browsers.
Comment 3 Jon 2014-10-02 15:56:26 UTC
(In reply to Bawolff (Brian Wolff) from comment #2)
> > 
> > Some of our users have limited data plans and this can be quite costly for
> > them. Given we have an `original file` link it seems surplus.
> 
> In extreme cases, downloading a multi gigabyte file on desktop is sometimes
> not fun either. Certain very large jpg files have been known to crash
> certain browsers.

True dat.
Personally I would advise just removing the link.
If it's a widely used feature maybe this should be a gadget/user preference but let's remove it and see what complaints if any there are.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links