Last modified: 2014-07-31 17:50:59 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T67090, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 65090 - Flow: incomplete old history
Flow: incomplete old history
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 65088
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Flow (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2014-05-09 19:25 UTC by Quiddity
Modified: 2014-07-31 17:50 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Quiddity 2014-05-09 19:25:42 UTC 
This page's History goes back to "05:32, 25 February 2014"
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Flow&action=history
but the page itself dates back to "23:24, 11 December 2013"

There are similar problems at other pages, eg.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flow/Developer_test_page
(7 February 2014 vs 3 February 2014)

Bug 61244 might contain clues/relevancy?
Comment 1 bsitu 2014-05-15 18:13:18 UTC 
This is "expected".  We only populate the most recent 500 entries and display the most recent 300 entries of a board history.  Fetching and displaying all at once is obviously not a good idea.  Maybe we could add pagination to the history, for example, 200 entries per load.  This would require some backend change to support pagination.
Comment 2 Quiddity 2014-05-15 18:28:16 UTC 
(In reply to bsitu from comment #1)
> Maybe we could add
> pagination to the history, for example, 200 entries per load.  This would
> require some backend change to support pagination.

See bug 65088 #0  (Mark as duplicate, if that's preferable. I thought they were separate issues.)
Comment 3 Quiddity 2014-07-31 17:50:59 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65088 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links