Last modified: 2014-11-14 22:00:34 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T64121, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 62121 - Collection: credits of images should list only the uploaders
Collection: credits of images should list only the uploaders
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Collection (Other open bugs)
REL1_22-branch
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-03-02 06:30 UTC by Quim Gil
Modified: 2014-11-14 22:00 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Quim Gil 2014-03-02 06:30:01 UTC
The PDFs produced by the collection extension include a section with credits and licenses of the images included.

EXPECTED

The names mentioned there correspond to the users that have uploaded that image of any previous version in the same page.


ACTUALLY

In addition to the uploaders, all the editors of the page are included as well. At the end it is impossible to know who uploaded the initial picture and potential updates, and who simply added a translation or a template. This is a mis-attribution.

You can test this here:

https://ca.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuari:Pere_prlpz/taller2&oldid=12992460

Fitxer:Can Manent Premià de Mar.jpg  (...)  Contribuïdors: Deosringas, Isidre blanc, Pere prlpz, Vriullop

Fitxer:L'Amistat Premià de Mar.jpg  (...)  Contribuïdors: Deosringas, Isidre blanc, Pere prlpz, Vriullop

In both cases Deosringas is the only uploader.
Comment 1 Pere López (pere prlpz) 2014-03-02 19:13:21 UTC
Furthermore, the names mentioned in PDF should be authors of images cited in the way required by the license of each image.
Comment 2 Marcin Cieślak 2014-03-12 08:26:21 UTC
It is impossible to solve this until you have a way to tell which edits are substantial and which are purely technical. The same applies to the textual content. We only have a "minor edit" flag.

Sometimes the original uploader is not the most important contributor, as somebody might have uploaded an improved version of the image (for example something was broken in the original file).

Actually we should use Extension:CommonsMetadata for this if enabled.
Comment 3 Pere López (pere prlpz) 2014-03-15 16:40:42 UTC
There are some ways to tell, or, at least, to tell better than now:

* People who have not uploaded any version of the file aren't the authors of the file. In the examples provided, there was only one version of the file, uploaded by one user, who obviously was the author. People who didn't upload anything aren't file authors, even if they edited file description page.

* Some license templates provide the requested way to credit the image. I expect most of those templates to be machine readable.
Comment 4 Quim Gil 2014-03-15 18:46:39 UTC
It is also possible to be the only uploader and not the author e.g. in the Flickr imports...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links