Last modified: 2013-06-18 16:17:40 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T7575, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 5575 - Emailing CheckUser results
Emailing CheckUser results
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CheckUser (Other open bugs)
All All
: Low enhancement with 12 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
Blocks: SWMT
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-04-14 23:20 UTC by Naconkantari
Modified: 2013-06-18 16:17 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Adds email functionality to CheckUser (7.67 KB, patch)
2006-04-14 23:22 UTC, Naconkantari

Description Naconkantari 2006-04-14 23:20:27 UTC
There should be an "email results" checkbox that will send the checkuser results
to the person who ran the check.
Comment 1 Naconkantari 2006-04-14 23:22:00 UTC
Created attachment 1530 [details]
Adds email functionality to CheckUser

This puts a checkbox on the CheckUser form to send the results to the editor's
email address.
Comment 2 Andrew Garrett 2007-01-24 08:42:33 UTC
Needs to be a unified diff file, not a copy of the file itself. Please resubmit
as a unified diff.
Comment 3 Andrew Garrett 2007-01-24 08:47:28 UTC
Hmm.. actually, it looks like a unified diff file, but there's something funky
about what you've done with the first file in it. The second file in the diff
looks OK.
Comment 4 FT2 2008-08-12 20:09:40 UTC
Crossref to bug 15129 (checkuser output formats) as well.
Comment 5 Mike.lifeguard 2009-12-31 05:09:43 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> but there's something funky
> about what you've done with the first file in it. The second file in the diff
> looks OK.

Does the first one need to be redone then? Did you ever get a chance to review the good file?
Comment 6 Mike.lifeguard 2010-02-13 01:38:10 UTC
Please don't adjust the importance or severity fields unless you're a developer.
Comment 7 p858snake 2011-04-30 00:09:18 UTC
*Bulk BZ Change: +Patch to open bugs with patches attached that are missing the keyword*
Comment 8 John Du Hart 2011-09-01 03:26:39 UTC
Comment on attachment 1530 [details]
Adds email functionality to CheckUser

Thanks for submitting a patch to MediaWiki. Unfortunately I'm going to have to
mark it as obsolete because it is not a valid diff (And probably wouldn't merge anymore anyway). If you could provide a recent diff of this patch working we would be glad to accept it.
Comment 9 James Forrester 2013-03-05 19:28:13 UTC
I'm afraid I'm going to WONTFIX this bug; though I can appreciate that it sounds sensible, e-mail is an inherently insecure system and we cannot build in a tool that would post confidential data as a matter of course to insecure communications methods.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.