Last modified: 2013-04-29 20:41:31 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T49814, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 47814 - RTL Support for VisualEditor
RTL Support for VisualEditor
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 33126
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
General (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal
: ---
Assigned To: James Forrester
:
Depends on:
Blocks: ve-rtl
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2013-04-29 03:13 UTC by Moriel Schottlender
Modified: 2013-04-29 20:41 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Moriel Schottlender 2013-04-29 03:13:02 UTC 
Add RTL support for page-, paragraph- and block-level elements in VisualEditor, as well as support for multi-language use in articles.

Full proposal (GSoC2013 project) is available here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Mooeypoo/GSOC_2013_Proposal:_RTL_Support_in_VisualEditor
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2013-04-29 09:44:22 UTC 
As this seems to be a tracking bug covering several aspects, marking as duplicate of bug 33126.

Please see the list of specific issues blocking bug 33126 in the "Depends on:" section of bug 33126, and if some of the specific issues that you mention are not covered (means: do not have a bug report), please file separate bug reports for each item. Thanks!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33126 ***
Comment 2 Amir E. Aharoni 2013-04-29 09:47:57 UTC 
It's a bug for tracking a GSoC proposal. I think that it should be reopened.
Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2013-04-29 10:33:16 UTC 
I'll tentatively reopen it and mark it as blocking 33126 instead.
Not sure though, maybe James knows. :)
Comment 4 Quim Gil 2013-04-29 20:41:31 UTC 
This is indeed a duplicate of bug 33126. mooeypoo please update your proposal linking to that bug.

No worries, these things happen to veteran bug submitters as well. :)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33126 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links