Last modified: 2012-03-21 17:48:29 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 35381 - Bump gerrit revision numbers above the last SVN revision
Bump gerrit revision numbers above the last SVN revision
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Git/Gerrit (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science...
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 22596 35144
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-03-21 11:49 UTC by Marcin Cieślak
Modified: 2012-03-21 17:48 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Marcin Cieślak 2012-03-21 11:49:07 UTC
As Gerrit revision numbers establish a linear timeframe, it would be good to have 
the revision number in Gerrit bumped above the last SVN number.

(at this time we are at r114357	so r114358 or maybe r120000 would be nice)

This would certainly help with Bugzilla (bug 35144). 

Maybe even Special:Code could continue to show the latest patchset of the revision.

It looks like only "change_id" sequence needs to be changed.
Comment 1 Chad H. 2012-03-21 11:54:11 UTC
We've already discussed this, and the conclusion was "no, we're not going to do this."
Comment 2 Marcin Cieślak 2012-03-21 11:56:55 UTC
May I ask why?
Comment 3 Chad H. 2012-03-21 12:06:13 UTC
To paraphrase the IRC discussion, "not worth the effort."
Comment 4 Marcin Cieślak 2012-03-21 15:23:15 UTC
It should be as simple as

INSERT INTO change_id VALUES (120000);

done from

ssh -p 29418 gerrit.wikimedia.org gerrit gsql 

prompt
Comment 5 Platonides 2012-03-21 15:42:12 UTC
That would also work. I had proposed 
 ALTER TABLE foo AUTO_INCREMENT = somereallybignumber;
Comment 6 Ryan Lane 2012-03-21 17:48:29 UTC
Again. No. I don't want to keep rehashing this.

There's no good reason to do this. The numbers aren't go to match up either way. All it does it make a huge gap in the change numbers we have in gerrit, and that's stupid.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links