# Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 34038 - Grammar and semantics need to be specified
 Summary: Grammar and semantics need to be specified
 Status: Product: NEW MediaWiki extensions Unclassified Component: Math (Other open bugs) unspecified All All Normal enhancement (vote) --- physikerwelt 17465 Show dependency tree / graph

 Reported: 2012-01-30 13:05 UTC by Tim Landscheidt 2013-10-16 10:00 UTC (History) 3 users (show) fred.wang peter.krautzberger physik --- --- ---

Attachments

 Tim Landscheidt 2012-01-30 13:05:10 UTC So that it isn't lost in bug 17465, comment 3 and 4, the grammar and semantics of the [itex] tag need to be specified. At the moment, the grammar is somehow defined by texvc, while the semantics differ between TeX source, TeX source as generated by texvc, (still) HTML as generated by texvc and rendering by MathJax. Personally, I'd opt for TeX as it's stable -- Knuth has made a point of not changing TeX's behaviour so that authors can rely on it. Renderings that differ from TeX's interpretation of input should be considered bugs to be fixed. Note that this doesn't mean that we have to specify TeX's behaviour. physikerwelt 2013-10-16 10:00:14 UTC Little progress on that... See http://www.formulasearchengine.com/texvc-light

 Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.