Last modified: 2004-09-03 19:40:27 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 304 - MonoBook style is not ideal.
MonoBook style is not ideal.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 285
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-09-03 03:18 UTC by Timwi
Modified: 2004-09-03 19:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Timwi 2004-09-03 03:18:00 UTC
Originally submitted by Toby Bartels (tobybartels)  2004-05-24 20:36

I love the layout of the MonoBook skin, but something's
amiss with the style (in the sense of stylesheets).  In
the attached image (created with Netscape 7 on Unix),
you should see my problem:  The boxes for forms are too

More specifically:
* In "Recent changes and stub display", the text in the
boxes is cut off at the bottom.  (This effect varies a
great deal -- sometimes better than these particular
examples, sometimes worse.)
* In "Misc settings", the checks in the checkboxes are
very small, thus hard to read.  (This effect is

These problems don't appear with the Standard skin --
but that skin isn't laid out nearly as nicely.  What
can I do to get the great page layout of MonoBook with
form boxes that I can easily read?

------------------------- Additional comments ------------------------
Date: 2004-05-24 20:40
Sender: SF user tobybartels

Dang it, I ''know'' that I've attached files before.  Let's
try that again.

Date: 2004-05-24 20:42
Sender: SF user tobybartels

The heck with it.  Just follow this link:

Date: 2004-09-03 05:07
Sender: SF user timwi

This bug has been migrated to MediaZilla:
Please leave additional comments or attachments there.
Comment 1 Timwi 2004-09-03 19:40:27 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 285 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.